Sunday, June 17, 2018

Anthony Bourdain - The Chef and Food

Vegetarians, and their Hezbollah-like splinter-faction, the vegans, are a persistent irritant to any chef worth a damn.

To me, life without veal stock, pork fat, sausage, organ meat, demi-glace, or even stinky cheese is a life not worth living.

Vegetarians are the enemy of everything good and decent in the human spirit, an affront to all I stand for, the pure enjoyment of food. The body, these waterheads imagine, is a temple that should not be polluted by animal protein. It's healthier, they insist, though every vegetarian waiter I've worked with is brought down by any rumor of a cold.

Oh, I'll accomodate them, I'll rummage around for something to feed them, for a 'vegetarian plate', if called on to do so. Fourteen dollars for a few slices of grilled eggplant and zucchini suits my food cost fine.

Anthony Bourdain


Monday, November 06, 2017

Scott Sauls tells of Tim Keller- The Kind of Leader Worth Following

When someone is mentored and appreciates what he received, it's not wrong to say what the mentor passed on to his protegé.  Scott Saul does that here about his mentor Tim Keller.

Monday, May 29, 2017

Calling Islamic Extremist "Fundementalist" and "Born Again" is not fair>

Recently is HA'ARETZ there was a fine article on why young muslim are becoming radicalized. (It's Not Islam That Drives Young Europeans to Jihad, France's Top Terrorism Expert Explains characterizes extremist Muslims as "fundementalist" and "born again."  If one understands where these terms come from, one would recognize that their use in this context is not fair.  So I responded to the article with the following post:

Thanks to Mr. Lerner for the informative article.  This research cited is helpful. By including the thoughts of Mr. Roy Mr. Lerner gives good credence to the thesis. However, I must take exception to Lerner quoting Roy using the words "fundementalist" and "born again."  These characterizations make an unfair connection to Christianity.  The early Christian fundamentalist movement was call to return to the foundational beliefs of Jesus as recorded in the Bible.  It was only later that "fundamentalists" became militant in their separatism.  But Christian fundamentalism never rose to the use of violence to which Muslim Extremists have resorted. So on those two counts, the use of "fundamentalism" to characterize extremist muslims is inaccurate nor fair.

Equally the use of "born again" simply is not applicable to radicalized muslims and is not a fair characterization.  Spiritual rebirth is a core part of how a person becomes a Christian.  Being "born again" does lead to a radical change in a person's life and a radical life style.  But this radical lifestyle is characterize by love.  Nowhere are "born again" Christians called to use violence to defend God or their faith.  In fact Jesus told his closest followers to "put the sword away...for all who draw the sword die by the sword (Matthew 26.52)

So in the interest of accuracy and fairness, I would ask Mr Lerner and Mr. Roy to not call Muslim extremists "fundamentalist" nor "born again."  It is simply intellectual laziness at best and unjust to Christians at worst. 

Labels: ,

Wednesday, May 17, 2017

Wednesday, February 15, 2017

How do we know if something true or a lie?

Thanks to Roxanne Richle, who's asked "How do you tell if something is true or a lie. How do you know who to believe?" ... I did some mental gymnastics.

We usually say something is true when a statement or notion corresponds to reality or fact. The difficulty comes from not having a good enough perspective or place to stand to see reality or have insight on "brute facts". And this causes confusion. As such, many people doubt the knowability of truth. This is an issue of epistemology, (how we know what what we know). So how can we know reality? As Christians, we turn to God to help us understand reality. God's message to us starts by talking about the creation of an objective reality...the visible universe. But he also reveals to us the invisible or unseen reality which because of our faith, we believe is true. And then of course, because God created the objective reality, we believe that observing the universe (the domain of science) can tell us a lot of about truth (of course imperfectly) because God created universe around us and so what we see speaks of a true reality. We postulate that what we see is connected to reality and then spend a life time confirming that postulate. So God's revelation through his word and his revelation through his creation, help us to know and understand reality. And thus we can discern what is true. Now, another rub comes, when we try to communicate to people who don't believe neither in God nor the knowabliltiy or existence of reality or nature of reality. Many people believe that each of us creates our own reality. Thus we each have our own version of the truth. And while this has some validity, we can never be so arrogant to say the we create our own reality. And thus, each person cannot have their private truth. Daniel Patrick Moynahan once said, 'Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Only God is entitled to his own facts. And the more we seek the facts of God, the better we are at determining truth.

Having said all that...knowing what is true and what is not true, takes a lot of sweat and time. Reality (like time and Ogres) is like an onion... it has layers.

Then, once we have a handle on truth, then we can start deciding who to believe. But, again, that takes sweat and time...which most of us don't really want to give. And therefore, we must be content to not always knowing the truth nor who to believe. That is whether living "tentatively" in faith is really helpful.

My father in law once said, "Most people don't know what they're talkng about." A great truth!

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, December 09, 2014

Why Pray if God Knows Best?

“‘Praying for particular things,’ said I, ‘always seems to me like advising God how to run the world. Wouldn’t it be wiser to assume that He knows best?’ ‘On the same principle,’ said he, ‘I suppose you never ask a man next to you to pass the salt, because God knows best whether you ought to have salt or not. And I suppose you never take an umbrella, because God knows best whether you ought to be wet or dry.’ ‘That’s quite different,’ I protested. ‘I don’t see why,’ said he. ‘The odd thing is that He should let us influence the course of events at all. But since He lets us do it in one way I don’t see why He shouldn’t let us do it in the other.’” (C.S. Lewis- God in the Dock, “Scraps,” para. 4.)

Friday, January 31, 2014

The Danger of Being One-sided

One the the things I see widely on Facebook is that people who are passionate about politics and speak out about it, seem to be doing so from a very one-sided perspective. The means that those are are commenting about issues are only reading and listening to people the agree with them.  To be well-informed, one needs to read and listen to people on all sides of the issues as well as all positions in politics be they right, center or left. Only then can we keep the wool from being pulled over our eyes by ideologues (like talk show hosts and syndicated columnists) who make their money by catering to the certain base of people with a certain base of belief.

This is how good biblical exegesis is done. You look at the full-view of writers down through history when seeking views of how a passage should be interpreted. The helps the interpreter deal with his or her own bias. Ultimately of course, good biblical exegesis allows the the text to speak and the meaning is established by the intention of the text (which was inspired by God and therefore we seek God's original intention). But lots of very bad biblical interpretation happens when we don't deal with our own bias. So reading and studying widely is important. It is the same when interpreting the times.

As I continue to read through Eric Metaxas' book "Bonhoeffer" I'm struck by how Hitler used one-sided, single perspective information to to control the hearts and minds of the people he got to follow him. That is the danger of only listening to one side or our favorite commentators. We get very polarized information. Now it's easier to only listen to people who believe like us. But it is ultimately dangerous. That's why I try to read very widely and not let others make my decisions for me. That's why I don't stop with people like Mark Levin (who says some very interesting things) and other radio commentators. He is convinced he is right and he wants you to be convinced he is right. But do we do the hard work of fact checking his pronouncements? Do we try to get to the other side of what he is saying as a check on his own bias?

In interpreting the times and interpreting the Bible, the only way to not have the wool pulled over our eyes is to be vigilant not to be one-sided in our research. Only then can we ask enough questions to arrive at a proper interpretation of both.

Labels: ,